In the Supreme Court’s oral debate, Roberts and Kavanaugh tend to retain Ouji Health Insurance
The Supreme Court launched an oral argument on the 10th to overturn the “Affordable Care Act” (Affordable Care Act) lawsuit. In the two-hour conference call, Chief Justice Roberts (John Roberts), speaking conservative judges Cavanaugh (Brett Kavanaugh), have a tendency to retain this commonly known as ” Europe in mind health care ” bill, The reason is that even if more than one clause is cancelled on the grounds of unconstitutionality, the Supreme Court has no position to repeal the entire bill. After Ouji Health Insurance passed the test of the Supreme Court in 2012, it is expected to pass again In the Supreme Court’s oral debate, Roberts and Kavanaugh tend to retain Ouji Health Insurance.
The “Affordable Health Insurance Act” is a major administration during the presidency of former President Obama. Since he was on the road in 2010, more than 20 million people have participated. Eighteen Republican “red states,” including Texas, filed a complaint with the court that Ouji Health’s “individual mandate” clause violates the spirit of the Constitution. The “Blue State” led by the 20 Democrats in California advocated that whether Ouke Health Insurance can exist after a certain clause was deleted must be traced back to the original legislative intention of Congress. The answer appeared as early as 2017, when the Republican Party The majority of Congress amended the clause to reduce the tax deduction penalty for uninsured persons to zero, but allows Ouji Health Insurance to continue to exist.
Roberts said to Texas Attorney General Kyle Hawkins in a spoken debate: “It is difficult for you to explain that Congress wants the entire bill to be repealed, because the same Congress did not repeal the entire bill before.” Roberts said, “They hope. It’s up to the courts, but that’s not our job In the Supreme Court’s oral debate, Roberts and Kavanaugh tend to retain Ouji Health Insurance.”
Kavanaugh, who was nominated to the Supreme Court after Trump took office, said that this is a “simple and clear” lawsuit because the rulings can follow the precedent. “Even if certain provisions are found to be invalid, the Supreme Court will not repeal the entire bill unless Congress clearly expressed its desire to do so In the Supreme Court’s oral debate, Roberts and Kavanaugh tend to retain Ouji Health Insurance.”
Kavanaugh said, judging from the previous case, the proper way to resolve the disputes of Oujie Health Insurance may be to “leave the rest of the bill intact” after cutting the “individual compulsory insurance” clause.
California Attorney General Michael Mongan said in an oral debate that the “Affordable Health Insurance Act” still provides people with the right to choose, “You can buy health insurance or not.”
The “Red State” advocated that Congress hopes that the “Affordable Health Insurance Law” must exist in its complete form. If the “Personal Mandatory Insurance” clause is removed, the entire Ouke Health Insurance will collapse. Conservative Justice Samuel Alito put forward a different view.
Alito metaphorically said that the reason for supporting this argument is that the compulsory guarantee clause is regarded as “one of the parts of the aircraft”, which plays a key role in the continued flight of the aircraft. “However, now that the parts have been removed, the aircraft has There is no accident and fall. How do we explain that this clause has a survival-related impact on keeping the entire bill operating?”
The Supreme Court will announce its ruling before next spring.